Monday, May 7, 2012

Delusional beliefs of Patrick J Miron

Protestant Theology & Catholic Doctrines

Delusion belifs of Patrick J Miron 

Exposed to cover & discover the Naked Truth“... Catholic responses to the Booklet: 

“Answers to my Catholic Friends” by Thomas F. Heinze …    Part 5b

patrick j miron commentary and accusal of the brethern

Patrick j Miron demenstrates the religious attitued that has led to the murder of

William Tyndale

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
William Tyndale
Bornc. 1492
Gloucestershire, England
Diedc. 6 October 1536
near Vilvoorde, Flanders
Cause of deathexecuted by strangling, thenburnt at the stake
Alma materOxford University
Known forTyndale Bible
William Tyndale (sometimes spelled Tynsdale TindallTindillTyndall; c. 1492 – 1536) was an English scholar who became a leading figure in Protestant reform in the years leading up to his execution. He is remembered for his translation of the Bible into English. He was influenced by the work of Desiderius Erasmus, who made the Greek New Testament available in Europe, and by Martin Luther.[1]
While a number of partial and complete translations had been made from the seventh century onward, the popularity of Wycliffe's Bible in the 14th century resulted in a ban on the publication of the Bible in English; almost all vernacular Bibles were confiscated and burned. Tyndale's illegal translation was the first of the new English Bibles of the Reformation, and the first to draw directly from Hebrew and Greek texts, and the first to take advantage of the new medium of the print, which allowed for wide distribution. This was taken to be a direct challenge to the hegemony of both the Roman Catholic Church and the English church and state. Tyndale also wrote, in 1530, The Practyse of Prelates, opposing Henry VIII's divorce on the grounds that it contravened scriptural law.
In 1535, Tyndale was arrested and jailed in the castle of Vilvoorde outside Brussels for over a year. He was tried for heresy, choked, impaled and burnt on a stake in 1536. The Tyndale Bible, as it was known, continued to play a key role in spreading Reformation ideas across the English-speaking world.[2] The fifty-four independent scholars who created the King James Version of the bible in 1611 drew significantly on Tyndale's translations. One estimation suggests the New Testament in the King James Version is 83% Tyndale's, and the Old Testament 76%.[3]

john wycliffe

Wycliffe's Bible is the name now given to a group of Bible translations into Middle English that were made under the direction of, or at the instigation of, John Wycliffe. They appeared over a period from approximately 1382 to 1395.[1] These Bible translations were the chief inspiration and chief cause of the Lollardmovement, a pre-Reformation movement that rejected many of the distinctive teachings of the Roman Catholic Church. In the early Middle Ages, most Western Christian people encountered the Bible only in the form of oral versions of scriptures, verses and homilies in Latin (other sources were mystery plays, usually conducted in the vernacular, and popular iconography). Though relatively few people could read at this time, Wycliffe’s idea was to translate the Bible into the vernacular.

A Catholic  religious response by a poorly educated self righteous Boysville of Michigan high school graduate.

Poorly educated by the Brothers of the holy cross (u if i can)


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Self-righteousness (also called sanctimoniousnesssententiousness, a holier-than-thou attitudes[1]) is a feeling of (usually) smug moral superiority[2] derived from a sense that one's beliefs, actions, or affiliations are of greater virtue than those of the average person.
The term "self-righteous" is often considered derogatory (see, for example, journalist and essayist James Fallows' description of self-righteousness[3] in regards to Nobel Peace Prize winners) particularly because self-righteous individuals are often thought to exhibit hypocrisy due to the belief that humans are imperfect and can therefore never be infallible, an idea similar to that of the Freudian defense mechanism of reaction formation. The connection between self-righteousness and hypocrisy predates Freud's views, however, as evidenced by the 1899 book Good Mrs. Hypocrite: A Study in Self-Righteousness, by the pseudonymous author "Rita."

[edit]See also

 “[mis]- Understandings” Part 5b


A patrick miron opinion; a friendly word of caution to our non-Catholic friends

(patrick j miron, opinion; you are deceived workers of "SATAN" 

Patrick j miron thinks; he is a "TRUE Apostle..

BUT Patrick j miron does not have the Baptism of the Holy Spirit as described in the Bible.

1sam 10, saul
acts ;6 stephen
acts 8 philip
acts 10 cornelious
acts 19 Paul ..

As paul said in acts 20, as soon as he leaves hungry wolves will come, or as in Gal ; who has bewitched you..

Did you receive the Holy Spirit by listening to Patrick j Miron??


Patrick j miron ;; Yah but "i go to daily mass"


 noun \ˈpī-ə-tē\
plural pi·e·ties

Definition of PIETY

: the quality or state of being pious: asa : fidelity to natural obligations (as to parents)b : dutifulness in religion : devoutness
: an act inspired by piety
: a conventional belief or standard : orthodoxy

Examples of PIETY

  1. He was admired for his extreme piety.
  2. <her piety is quiet but profound>

Patrick J miron believes that HIS "piety" behavior is evidence of his spiritual condition..

just like the Pharisees and Sadducees

The Pharisees

The most important of the three were the Pharisees because they are the spiritual fathers of modern Judaism. Their main distinguishing characteristic was a belief in an Oral Law that God gave toMoses at Sinai along with the Torah. The Torah or Written Law was akin to the U.S. Constitution in the sense that it set down a series of laws that were open to interpretation. The Pharisees believed that God also gave Moses the knowledge of what these laws meant and how they should be applied. This oral tradition was codified and written down roughly three centuries later in what is known as the Talmud.
The Pharisees also maintained that an afterlife existed and that God punished the wicked and rewarded the righteous in the world to come. They also believed in a messiah who would herald an era of world peace.
Pharisees were in a sense blue-collar Jews who adhered to the tenets developed after the destruction of the Temple; that is, such things as individual prayer and assembly in synagogues.

The Sadducees

The Sadducees were elitists who wanted to maintain the priestly caste, but they were also liberal in their willingness to incorporate Hellenism into their lives, something the Pharisees opposed. The Sadducees rejected the idea of the Oral Law and insisted on a literal interpretation of the Written Law; consequently, they did not believe in an afterlife, since it is not mentioned in the Torah. The main focus of Sadducee life was rituals associated with the Temple.

Patrick j miron " Quotes paul of the bible , with out having any spiritual authority or demenstration of the Holy Spirit..

New International Version (©1984)
My message and my preaching were not with wise and persuasive words, but with a demonstration of the Spirit's power,New Living Translation (©2007)
And my message and my preaching were very plain. Rather than using clever and persuasive speeches, I relied only on the power of the Holy Spirit.
English Standard Version (©2001)
and my speech and my message were not in plausible words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power,
New American Standard Bible (©1995)
and my message and my preaching were not in persuasive words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power,
King James Bible (Cambridge Ed.)
And my speech and my preaching was not with enticing words of man's wisdom, but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power:
International Standard Version (©2008)
My message and my preaching were not accompanied by clever, wise words, but by a display of the Spirit's power,
Aramaic Bible in Plain English (©2010)
And my message and my preaching were not in the persuasiveness of the words of philosophy, but in the demonstration of The Spirit and power,

2Cor.11:13 to 15 “For such men are false apostles

[NOTE: There can logically only be One Truth per precise issue.

What are the odds that the truth didn’t happen for 1, 500 YEARS after the Bible had been written?] deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.

 So it is not strange if his servants also disguise themselves as servants of righteousness.

 [Perhaps unknowingly]

Their end will correspond to their deeds.”

The Bible never infers that that any saints, living or dead, sympathize with us more than God does. …

This is  a irrelevant observation.

Paul speaks directly to and about those he understands are doing all that is required to become saints. He praises there example and ask others to emulate them. Catholics do not so much prayer to Saints [as THROUGH them to God], NOT because they are more sympathetic than God; No, we Catholics pray THROUGH them because they STAND IN THE VERY PRESENCE OF GOD, and then add to our prayers, there own on our behalf.]

No comments:

Post a Comment