Patrick j miron likes to point out that the bible is a catholic book.
but the inference is that it is a Roman catholic book..
but having knowledge of the real history of the the bible is helpful ..
the truth is hidden .. in religiousity
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Kleenex discovery Education and God's blessing with Patrick j Miron
yes if you follow the advise of Patrick j miron, you will soon be brilliant, and know more than any protestent, or Luthern, remember the catholic riligion "invented" the bible.. everyone else is just a "copy-cat"
Fly on the Wall "vs" delusional beliefs of patrick j miron
It is interesting that Patrick j Miron thinks "highly-of himself" a moment of spiritual "pride" because he fount one book written that does not comply to his education and training on bible scripture..
Patrick J miron has not figured out -- many people are not led-by the-Holy-spirit- no matter how much education and training they have..
Patrick j miron's opinion #128
God Himself limits their ability to understand the bible by imposing upon them the plague of Ignorance.
This will be proven and become very evident as we proceed though the booklet Thomas authored, and which, God willing, we shall prove and provide biblical evidence of that explains and supports the Catholic Positions.
I (patrick j miron)have for sometime now been Blessed by God, and able to recognize God’s hand in the lack of RIGHT understanding of what the bible really says as a rather common Protestant trait.
In fact; it seems to be one thing many of the denominations have in common. This ought not be a surprise to any of us who are “bible-savvy,” as clear warning is given by God through the bible itself., in a variety of ways.
Patrick J miron has not figured out -- many people are not led-by the-Holy-spirit- no matter how much education and training they have..
What became immediately apparent is the sincerity of the positions held by Mr. Heinze., and his evident desire to be factual and true.
Which only affirms my own opinion that God Himself has a role in these well-intended Protestant positions which , nevertheless,
reflect serious-errant misunderstandings of Catholic Doctrines and Dogma, along with an in ability to separate “church-practices,” which can change, from doctrine and dogma which cannot be changed.
reflect serious-errant misunderstandings of Catholic Doctrines and Dogma, along with an in ability to separate “church-practices,” which can change, from doctrine and dogma which cannot be changed.
Patrick j miron's opinion #128
God Himself limits their ability to understand the bible by imposing upon them the plague of Ignorance.
This will be proven and become very evident as we proceed though the booklet Thomas authored, and which, God willing, we shall prove and provide biblical evidence of that explains and supports the Catholic Positions.
I (patrick j miron)have for sometime now been Blessed by God, and able to recognize God’s hand in the lack of RIGHT understanding of what the bible really says as a rather common Protestant trait.
In fact; it seems to be one thing many of the denominations have in common. This ought not be a surprise to any of us who are “bible-savvy,” as clear warning is given by God through the bible itself., in a variety of ways.
Friday, June 15, 2012
It has been asked: Is not any religion better than none? ...and that all heresies condemned by the Church [of Rome] are to be anathematized; that out of the [Roman] Catholic faith there is no salvation
It has been asked: Is not any religion better than none? The answer is that a bad religion is worse than none; that truth will have more power on the mind that is blackened over with prejudice; and that nature is a better teacher than superstition. The savage slays his enemy, but he does not torture his neighbour for refusing to bow down to the same idol as himself. The Arab plunders, but he has no confessor to teach him perfidy: he keeps his oath, and the man who has shared his bread and salt is safe, whether he prays towards Mecca of Jerusalem. Ignorance is obviously better than the fierce fallacy which at once enfeebles the mind, inflames the passions, and plants an inveterate hostility to truth in the heart of man. To teach error is not to teach at all.
It has been asked: Must not Popery, by acknowledging the principles of Christianity, be, at least, good in part? The answer is that the acknowledgement of those principles was necessary to their perversion. To delude is impossible but1 under the semblance of sincerity. By the constitution of the human mind, wherever truth and falsehood are thus compounded, the falsehood inevitably overwhelms the truth, because the very attempt to combine them implies the worldliness which leads to error. We might as well yoke the living to the dead in the expectation of giving life to the corpse: the corpse corrupts the living. We must have truth alone or falsehood alone. How can a man believe in God and yet worship an idol?
In the year 1563 the Council of Trent decreed that all persons promoted to Benefices with care of souls should make a public confession of their faith, and in the following year Pius IV issued the formulary which is since called his Creed and which is acknowledged as the standard of Romish doctrine. As the subject is familiar to all readers of Church history, I shall merely glance at the nature of this memorable document, which is generally divided into separate Articles.
Those Articles pronounce the Church [of Rome] to be the only judge of the sense of the Scripture;
appoint seven sacraments;
declare that in the mass there is offered a true propitiatory sacrifice for the living and the dead; that the whole body and blood,
soul and divinity of our Lord are offered in the Eucharist, and that the sacrifice is offered in either kind alone;
that there is a purgatory and that souls therein are helped by the suffrages of the faithful; that the saints are to be invocated3,
that they pray for us to God, and that their relics are to be held in veneration; that the images of Christ, the Virgin and saints are to be retained,
and to be held in "due veneration";
that the power of indulgences was given by God to the Church; and that the use of them is most wholesome;
that the Church of Rome is the mother and mistress of all churches;
that all things declared by the Councils, and especially the Council of Trent,
are to be undoubtingly received,
and that all heresies condemned by the Church [of Rome] are to be anathematized;
Enquiry into the Scriptures is the foundation of faith in the mind of the Christian;
but Popery commands an implicit belief, not in the Scriptures,
[…] The especial15 characteristic of the Romish Church is image worship, and this charge it virtually acknowledges by excluding the second Commandment.
Popery attempts a subterfuge16 under the words "due veneration";
but who is to be the judge of "due veneration", or who ever saw the mass solemnised without asking himself:
Could worship go further? The jewelled crowns and tissued robes of the images, the golden shrines and votive tablets, the lifted hands, the adoring eyes, the hymns, the chorus of prayer!
What mean they? If the Deity Himself descended on the altar, could man offer him more significant homage?
The divine commandment excludes all worship of an image, all "due veneration" – even the presence of an image.
"Thou shalt not make to thyself any graven image."
The ground of the commandment is perfectly intelligible.
An image must be a false representation of God; it gives a false familiarity with the divine presence; it makes the Infinite local and gives the Omnipotent to the hands of a man.
What work of canvass or stone can possibly realise17 even to the mind the Eternal?
And the conception becomes lower still when miracles, tears and smiles of divine benefice, and the melancholy artifices of the Breviary, are attributed to the picture and the statue.
"our Holy Mother the Church […] to which it belongs to judge of the true sense and interpretation of the Scriptures".
Thus the Council of Trent fastens the padlock on the Scriptures at the moment when it hangs the chain on the human mind.
Enquiry into the Scriptures is thenceforth useless to the whole community of Romanism.
Monday, June 4, 2012
A Heretic is a baptized person who rejects an authoritative teaching of the Roman Catholic Church.
Benedict XVI’s Recent Heresies
By Bro. Michael Dimond, O.S.B.
Introductory Note: * A Heretic is a baptized person who rejects an authoritative teaching of the Roman Catholic Church.
A schismatic is a person who refuses communion with a true Pope or refuses communion with true Catholics.
An apostate is a person who rejects the Christian faith completely. All heretics, schismatics and apostates sever themselves from the Catholic Church automatically (Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, June 29, 1943).
Therefore, if one is a heretic he is not a Catholic (Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum June 29, 1896). And most heretics convince themselves that they are not denying any dogma when they actually are.
This page will be updated periodically.
(All emphasis, such as bolding, underlining, and italicization is not necessarily that of the quoted author.) * Heresies from Benedict XVI used in past Heresy of the Week columns are below, beginning with the latest one.
His worst heresies are found in our section on: The Heresies of Benedict XVI file. Other past Heresies of the Week are probably found in either the Heresy of the Week Archive or the Some of the Recent Feature Articles page or The Heresy of the Week Archive for those from years back.
2012
2011
Benedict XVI prays for the dead with the Chief Rabbi of Rome, promotes the motto of the French revolution: liberty, equality and fraternity, and more
Benedict XVI says the “Orthodox” have saints and martyrs, and looks forward to 2017 and the opportunity to celebrate a common ecumenical commemoration for the 500th anniversary of the posting of Martin Luther’s theses
2010
Benedict XVI’s Most Heretical Speech and Other Heresies from his Recent Visit to Scotland and England
Benedict XVI Sends Good Wishes to a Rabbi for Yom Kippur and Expresses his Gratitude and Affection for the Synagogue in Rome
2009
Benedict XVI praises “the great vision” of the apostate evolutionist priest, Teilhard de Chardin; Benedict XVI also endorses Harry Potter and Bruce Springsteen
Benedict XVI promotes the heresy of religious freedom; he states that the SSPX is not in communion with the Church; and he aggressively promotes the need for “a world political authority”
Benedict XVI’s Flight of Apostasy: Benedict XVI’s Outrageous Heresies during his recent trip to Africa
Benedict XVI and the Vatican declare, in a special published note, that if Bishop Williamson doesn’t accept belief in “the Shoah” (“the Holocaust”) he cannot be accepted as a Catholic; and other amazing heresies from the apostate Benedict XVI
Benedict XVI’s incredibly heretical statements on the Russian “Orthodox” Church and Schismatic “Orthodox” Patriarch Kirill
Benedict XVI calls the schismatic “Orthodox” Church great and venerable; His telegram to Barack Obama; and his Heretical Addresses to new Ambassadors
2008
Benedict XVI speaks of his esteem for ministry in the schismatic “Orthodox” Church, his best wishes for a schismatic’s ministry, and he declares a schismatic’s service to be “service to the Church.”
The Vatican publicizes that the newly elected “Orthodox” schismatic in Athens is the “Archbishop” of Athens and all of Greece
Benedict XVI states that he is grateful to a schismatic non-Catholic Church and promotes the heresy of religious liberty again
Benedict XVI states again that St. Paul’s desire was not so much to baptize all peoples and that we should have respect for different false religions
Benedict XVI praises praying with heretics and states that Catholics have a bond of communion with Lutherans
Benedict XVI states that the deceased leader of the schismatic “Orthodox” Church was a distinguished Pastor in the Church, the Archbishop of Greece and a faithful servant of the Lord
Benedict XVI states that people should have the right to change their religion, practice false religions and that people should respect false religions
Benedict XVI states that false religions should be valued; that Church teachings evolve; that things adopted by the authorities of the Catholic Church have been shown by history to be false
2007
Benedict XVI praises both Assisi Prayer Meetings and states that St. Paul was not concerned for the salvation of those who did not hear the Gospel!
Benedict XVI states that it’s necessary to be enriched by contact with members of false religions and that we should be open and have respect for heretical beliefs
Benedict XVI’s amazingly heretical statements praising leaders of false religions at a recent Assisi-like Interreligious Prayer-Meeting
Benedict XVI’s incredibly heretical statements praising schismatics and on how infants don’t need to be baptized
Benedict XVI promotes that the Sacraments can be Given to Non-Catholics and Promotes Religious Freedom for all False Religions
Benedict the Heretic strikes again; he states once again that a schismatic leader is a pastor in the Church
Benedict XVI demonstrates his usual heresy in the 2000th issue of the Vatican’s Newspaper (L'Osservatore Romano)
Benedict XVI sowing doubt about the meaning of Nicea and “Consubstantial” in his book "Jesus of Nazareth (2007)"
2006
2005
A HERETIC CANNOT BE A VALID POPE
It is a proven fact that Ratzinger (now Benedict XVI) is a non-Catholic heretic. The Catholic Church teaches that a heretic cannot be validly elected Pope, since a heretic is not a member of the Catholic Church. Ratzinger, who is now Benedict XVI, is a non-Catholic Antipope whose election was utterly null and void.
Pope Paul IV, Bull Cum ex Apostolatus Officio, Feb. 15, 1559: “6. In addition, [by this Our Constitution, which is to remain valid in perpetuity We enact, determine, decree and define:-] that if ever at any time it shall appear that any Bishop, even if he be acting as an Archbishop, Patriarch or Primate; or any Cardinal of the aforesaid Roman Church, or, as has already been mentioned, any legate, or even the Roman Pontiff, prior to his promotion or his elevation as Cardinal or Roman Pontiff, has deviated from the Catholic Faith or fallen into some heresy:
(i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless;
(ii) it shall not be possible for it to acquire validity (nor for it to be said that it has thus acquired validity) through the acceptance of the office, of consecration, of subsequent authority, nor through possession of administration, nor through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff, or Veneration, or obedience accorded to such by all, nor through the lapse of any period of time in the foregoing situation;
(iii) it shall not be held as partially legitimate in any way…
(i) the promotion or elevation, even if it shall have been uncontested and by the unanimous assent of all the Cardinals, shall be null, void and worthless;
(ii) it shall not be possible for it to acquire validity (nor for it to be said that it has thus acquired validity) through the acceptance of the office, of consecration, of subsequent authority, nor through possession of administration, nor through the putative enthronement of a Roman Pontiff, or Veneration, or obedience accorded to such by all, nor through the lapse of any period of time in the foregoing situation;
(iii) it shall not be held as partially legitimate in any way…
(vi) those thus promoted or elevated shall be deprived automatically, and without need for any further declaration, of all dignity, position, honour, title, authority, office and power….
10. No one at all, therefore, may infringe this document of our approbation, re-introduction, sanction, statute and derogation of wills and decrees, or by rash presumption contradict it. If anyone, however, should presume to attempt this, let him know that he is destined to incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed Apostles, Peter and Paul.
Given in Rome at Saint Peter's in the year of the Incarnation of the Lord 1559, 15th February, in the fourth year of our Pontificate.
+ I, Paul, Bishop of the Catholic Church…”
10. No one at all, therefore, may infringe this document of our approbation, re-introduction, sanction, statute and derogation of wills and decrees, or by rash presumption contradict it. If anyone, however, should presume to attempt this, let him know that he is destined to incur the wrath of Almighty God and of the blessed Apostles, Peter and Paul.
Given in Rome at Saint Peter's in the year of the Incarnation of the Lord 1559, 15th February, in the fourth year of our Pontificate.
+ I, Paul, Bishop of the Catholic Church…”
St. Robert Bellarmine: “A pope who is a manifest heretic automatically (per se) ceases to be pope and head, just as he ceases automatically to be a Christian and a member of the Church. Wherefore, he can be judged and punished by the Church. This is the teaching of all the ancient Fathers who teach that manifest heretics immediately lose all jurisdiction.” (De Romano Pontifice, II, 30)
(This article may be quoted, spread and copied but the author’s name or our website: www.vaticancatholic.com or www.mhfm1.com must be given. Copyright, Most Holy Family Monastery, 2005-2011.)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)